On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:47:38PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:04:55PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > > It would be really nice if we could identify+fix any links > > to Jan's version, to avoid other people getting caught by this > > trap. > > I find: > > http://lilypond.org/gub/lilypond > http://lilypond.org/gub/
ick, I forgot about those. Could you add a Type-maintainability issue to fix those? > > - Is this build on x86 or 64 ? > > It is running on a VirtualBox VM which is 32-bit: > $ uname -a > Linux colin-laptop 2.6.32-26-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 09:00:03 UTC > 2010 i686 GNU/Linux > > The host is Win7 64-bit. huh, thanks! It might be nice to have a list of "success cases" for lilydev; I've heard conflicting reports of whether it works within a VM or not. Could you add that to the CG page about building GUB, listing - Dell optiplex 760 (with core 2 quad), running 32-bit ubuntu 10.04 - win7 64-bit, running lilydev 2.6 (?) inside virtualbox 32-bit - whatever Phil and/or James have, if they can also report success no rush, especially since proposing a patch for lilypond git has a completely separate process than proposing a patch for gub git. :( - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
