On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:33:24PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" > <[email protected]> > To: "Lilypond Dev" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 7:29 PM > Subject: Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant? > > > >On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote: > >>See: > >> > >>http://www.charltonhall.eclipse.co.uk/ > >> > >>That's the space I get with my ISP account so bandwidth (cost) might > >>be an issue. Would be nice if someone could mirror it so somewhere > >>more robust/cheaper. > > > >Ok. Alternately, you could only put up a few binaries (say, > >darwin-x86, mingw, linux-x86, and linux-64). Also, advertizing it > >on lilypond-user as unofficial binaries will probably get you > >between 10 and 100 downloads in total. At 20 megs each, that's an > >(estimated) maximum of 2 GB bandwidth. That's probably ok for a > >residential ISP, but you may want to double-check. > > > >If anybody else wants to chime in and offer hosting, of course > >that would be quite appreciated. > > I'm personally not convinced this is worth doing. However, if we > really want to do it, I could host it off philholmes.net/lilypond, > or a new domain. I can set Colin or others up with ftp access if > needed.
I'd appreciate it, Phil. I pay a quid for everything beyond a gig. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
