"Keith OHara" <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:42:36 -0700, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > >> if the next note starts with a dynamic, the "smorz." will merge into >> that dynamic which is not wanted for. > > Presumably because the hairpin is a \> and the next note is \f in this > case. Often, though, we do want a \> to continue into a \p. > > Mostly I wanted to talk you out of this worry : > >> It would seem that _trailing_ <> are not really something we should >> lightly suggest since it is unknown what their articulations will >> attach themselves to. > > We can make it clear that <>\! attaches the end of the hairpin to the > following note (or bar-line if there is no note) by saying ...
No need, really. The point of what <> does in relation to time is brought across by the example(s) I put in. Adding more complex examples is not going to be more educational. Hairpins don't attach to notes or barlines, by the way, but to musical moments (via a horizontal position). This is in contrast to accents like -. or ( or so: if those find only a bar line or \skip, they don't appear. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
