On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:32:53AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2012/6/28 <d...@gnu.org>: > > A feature should be documented, or it will not be discoverable. > > Well, they should be documented, but I propose to open a new issue to do so.
That sounds sensible. In the past we've said that new features do not need to be documented in the same patch that adds it. > > If feasible, a regtest should be added in input/regression. Whether > > this is possible for essentially multi-page features, I don't know, so > > it is possible that this particular feature does not really lend itself > > to a regtest. > > I found only one multi-page-file in the regression-tests containing a > feature of titling-init.ly (i.e. `not-first-page'): > input/regression/page-breaks.ly > But I think this file tests something else. > So I'd suggest to open a new issue for that, too. Here I disagree slightly; it would be really good if new features were covered by the regtests as soon as they were added, so that we have a chance of noticing when they break. It doesn't need to be in a new regtest; adding it to an exising regtest is fine. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
