On Jun 30, 2012, at 10:26 PM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" <m...@mikesolomon.org> writes: > >> Hey all, >> >> Once the most recent critical issues are squashed, are people up for >> forking off a stable branch from 2.15? Administratively we'd go into >> cherrypick mode like we did for 2.13 where we institute a moratorium >> on pushing to the stable branch and have a cherrypick Czar (like Carl >> was a year-ish ago) port critical bugfixes to this branch. All release >> candidates would come from this branch. > > That sounds like a good idea, but the typical death of our release > candidates was by regressions more than a month old rather than > last-minute work done before the release candidate. Our "stable branch" > basically is the last development release. The cherry-picking I did was not in order to get 2.14 out, but rather to backport fixes from 2.15 into 2.14.x. At least, iirc. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
