On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:48:48PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Graham Percival >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > To avoid slowing down programming to a crawl, I figure that we’ll >> > identify some subset of these regtests and have a separate make >> > regtests-quick command which only evaluates that subset. >> > >> > As a rule of thumb, I’d say that the regtests-quick target should >> > take as long as a make from scratch. >> >> *very* good idea! +20 > > Well, there's no reason why this needs to be tied to a specific > release policy. There's certainly no harm in implementing the > basic infrastructure of "make regtests-quick", leaving any debate > about exacty which files qualify for the "quick" test. > > Problem is, somebody needs to sit down and do it. Do you feel > like adding that?
ok, but not until GSoC finishes. If anyone else is interested, go for it. > - 10-100 (?) hours of helpful users organizing and writing .ly > files to cover all (? or most?) functionality I can help here. > - somebody to organize the entire effort I can help here. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
