On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:30:49AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > > > The policy is: David Kastrup has sole authority over what goes > > into stable/2.16 and which release(s) will have a version number > > of 2.16.x, until 2012 Dec 31. > > Or until he asks to relinquish control, or there is sufficient agreement > among core developers that he should.
I've added "if he quits, we have a new discussion" to the list. > Being able to look at a list of Critical issues is useful to make sure > no oversights happen. So I'd propose that we use the same rules as > before for marking issues as Critical (in particular, letting a > regression automatically imply a Critical issue), but that I have the > leeway of downmarking and/or ignoring them. Changed accordingly. > > - translators do not merge or cherry-pick onto stable/2.16 > > unless specifically requested to do so. > > So nobody should cherry-pick or merge > _from_ this branch either, in particular not into the mainline, since > release-specific fixes might be unsuitable for the development branch. Added, thanks. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
