If this isn't covered already, then could you add a regtest for this?
Mike presumably had some reason for removing it in the first place, so if this doesn't produce a visible change in any regtests then it's likely that somebody will make this change again in the future. http://codereview.appspot.com/6406051/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
