David Kastrup wrote Monday, July 16, 2012 9:18 AM
> Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >>> One really ugly problem is interpreting things like "4.". Looks like a >>> duration, but then we have >>> input/regression/dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly: line-width = 4.\cm >> >> I am against making a change like this outwith[1] of GLISS. It >> could involve a lot of user pain (and documentation-editing >> pain!), so I think it's important to at least pretend[2] to have >> good user consultation beforehand. > > I disagree with "a lot of user pain". > >> As far as the actual proposal goes, I'm generally in favor. [snip a long convincing argument] I'm generally in favour too, but I'd be happier if this were deferred until 2.17. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
