> 2012/7/18 Janek Warchoł <[email protected]>: >> (however, it would be even more awesome if it was one general
function
>> for all purposes ;) )
Considering this some more, I think it's best at the moment to restrict the function to spanners. The expanded function encompassing spanners and breakable items appears to work just fine with the examples I adapted from Harm's snippet. However, I'm concerned about other overridable properties, for example those made available through the 'break-aligned-interface: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/internals/break_002daligned_002dinterface If this patch proves successful, it could later be enhanced to include breakable items after more study. What do you think? -David http://codereview.appspot.com/6397054/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
