Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com> writes: > 2012/7/24 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> convert-ly can't work reliably since it does not understand the >> structure of LilyPond files. > (...) >> Reliable conversions need to understand structure. You can do them on >> XML. LilyPond is too complex. > (...) > > Right, so a "perfect" convert-ly would solve all problems but this is > impossible. Then, it is now clear to me that a syntax stability for a > long period of time is very desirable. > > Besides, I have weighted more than once the possibility of updating > all Mutopia music. That would improve its value (and the opposite, > i.e. doing nothing is effectively making it to lose its value more and > more).
That sounds like a good user community project. It is very important for that sort of thing to have timely response to user contributions. I believe that the current Mutopia project may be a bit problematic in that department. Some automated and semi-automated procedures (proof-reading interfaces?) might help with that. > Just thinking aloud, sorry. I don't want to waste your time. I realize > this is fairly naïve. When "naïve" serves the majority of a large user community... -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
