2012/7/23 John Mandereau <[email protected]>: > Il giorno lun, 23/07/2012 alle 19.25 +0200, David Kastrup ha scritto: >> Maybe running gerrit on it would be an option? > > This sounds an excellent idea.
Wait, there has already been much discussion about patch review tools, much of it happened when I was completely away. Before diving into setting up Gerrit, I'd like to summarize the pros and cons of Rietveld+Google Code Issues+Patchy (current system), Gerrit, ReviewBoard, and others, judging on features that have been discussed on this list. Be warned that I tend to prefer Gerrit, but I don't want to spend time setting it before a contradictory assesment (summarizing previous discussion and comparing the features of these tools advertized by their manuals) and sufficient approval from core developers. John _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
