On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 12:09:51PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes: > > > I'd sent out a note of agreement before but I'll send out another one > > just to signal that I'm 100% for incrementally freezing parts of > > LilyPond's syntax. Specifically, I'm comfortable saying that > > everything in the examples above should be frozen. > > \tempo syntax is quite an abomination. It is one of those things that > regularly cause parser changes to trip up.
\times syntax is quite an abomination. It is one of those things that regularly cause people to trip up. > So when saying "Everything should be frozen", I'd rather hope > this means the _elements_ to freeze, but not their exact current > syntax. Yes. I am working on https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/tree/master/gliss and will send an outline of future discussion in a few hours. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
