Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 01:08:42PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> The stumbling block is _writing_ the Scheme code, not submitting it. >> When is the last time a code review complained about Scheme code >> formatting? > > I gave URLs in the proposal, but here you go: > http://codereview.appspot.com/5343050/#msg1 > http://codereview.appspot.com/5343050/#msg5 > (note that there were 3 or 4 different rietveld issues discussing > that particular patchset, so previous discussion is not on that > page)
The submitter _reformatted_ existing code with different conventions. His own work was not put into question as far as I can see. > That's not necessarily the last time, but it was within the past > year, and it royally screwed over a new contributor. I don't see that picking some rules will change the perspectives of gratuitous changes significantly. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
