Graham Percival wrote Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:05 AM
> Not much discussion after the mid-way point. I'm not certain if > this means that everybody agrees, or they just think I'm > completely wrong and it's not worth even discussing it (as > happened with the first proposal for stable release handling). > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_4.html > > > ** Summary > > Let’s start stabilizing portions of the LilyPond input syntax. We > will guarantee that selected elements of the syntax will not > change (even with convert-ly) during the 3.x releases. This will > be a slow process, and the first phase (2012) will not even cover > the entire “single staff notation” section in the tutorial. I'm happy with this proposal. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
