> Pushing to staging means "I consider this change to be safe and
> can't imagine anybody suggesting anything to change".
Actually, this is what I still believe. However, we probably agree to
disagree, and going the Rietveld route is certainly the safe way.
> For changes with potentially large impact, I use a review even when
> I am of the opinion that I am by far the best-suited programmer for
> dealing with a particular problem.
What exactly do you consider a `large impact'? A large number of
files involved? Larger visible changes?
> It is a change with large effects which is part of the reason Werner
> considers it desirable.
Compared to the size of the documentation, its less than a tiny
effect: As mentioned earlier, less then 50 Cyrillic *characters*
previously mssing will appear in a few code snippets.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
