On 30 août 2012, at 02:21, Keith OHara <[email protected]> wrote:
> Phil Holmes <email <at> philholmes.net> writes: > >> Anyway, I found a number that concern me. See them at >> http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.1/. > > I think all the concerns are covered by your tracker items, or otherwise > covered, or not concerns. > > completion-heads-polyphony-2.png -- Mike's skylines made a minor change > to issue 1537 > > repeat-sign-global-size-10.png -- as the author intended > > stencil-color-rotation.png -- In the past, rotation worked after LilyPond > had placed everything, so users had to do our own collision avoidance. > We could tweak the hand-tuned rotation-point the test to accommodate > Mikes tighter spacing, if the collision is distracting. > > mensural-ligatures.png -- Mike's skylines patch changed spacing with > textLengthOn, but maybe for the better in most cases. The overrides in > this test complicate the situation. The change is that, in > \relative f { \textLengthOn \repeat unfold 4 {f'-"MEM" f-"EME" }} > the words used to be in one line with the letters run up tight; > now they stagger. > > markup-note-dot.png -- same as above, with markup instead of just text > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel I was gonna respond but Keith said everything I would have said. The other way to deal w/ rotation is to build it into the stencil - the rotate command is applied right before going to the backend, but if ly:stencil-rotate is part of the stencil definition, the skyline patch will pick it up. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
