On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:04 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > This would also seem to form an excellent starting point for having > LilyPond interpret MusicXML directly, bypassing converters as well as > the ly parser. While this would not offer the full tweaking power and > expressivity of ly, it would certainly be a good way of interfacing in a
While sxml is certainly nice, I wouldn't overstate its usefulness. The big problem with musicxml is that it has a data model that is completely different from anything inside lilypond, something that sxml does not help a lot with. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
