David Kastrup writes:
> What issues were raised?
Janek and Graham raised the `what is a music function / let's make
everything postfix' issue. Han-Wen raised the issue of [nameless]
optional arguments.
>> instead of
>>
>> \relative { a \parenthesize b c }
>>
>> we could have something* like
>>
>> (relative { a (parenthesize b) c })
>> relative ({a parenthesize (b) c})
>>
>> I don't think there are easy ways to combine or drop ( and }, ie have
>> something like
>>
>> {relative a b c}
>> foo = relative
>> {foo a b c}
>>
>> Or the C-style equivalents.
>
> Who do we think to be doing a favor with that?
Well, that's the question. This is also a good chance to, ahum,
once and for all decide on leaving things as they are.
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
