----- Original Message -----
From: "John Mandereau" <[email protected]>
To: "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Devel" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
Il giorno lun, 10/09/2012 alle 16.12 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
Thanks, John. I'm following the CG to the letter, and type:
git checkout origin/release/unstable
Working through this again - I've now got my local release/unstable branch,
but the command above still puts me in detached head. I'm thinking it's a
typo, and should be:
git checkout release/unstable
Strikes me we
should not _require_ a release/unstable branch on the machine where the
updates are being done.
What's the problem with creating a new local branch to track a remote
one? Creating branches is cheap, isn't it?
Just thought the most vanilla machine might be best, but I've got the new
branch now.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
