Thomas Morley <[email protected]> writes: > Ok, I'll investigate further. > > BTW, lilypond is now on 2.16. Should we plan the next round of LSR-update?
<URL:http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=lilypond> I would lean towards waiting as long as 2.16 has not made its way into "unstable", preferably also "testing". Anybody up to figuring out whether there is something we can do to make that happen? Of course, _planning_ the next round of LSR updates is fine. It is not like there will be functional changes in 2.16 any more (check <URL:code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=1&q=Label%3DBackport> for more info, disregarding the 2.15 or earlier labels), so if you get a file ported over, you should not need to revisit it again except in very, very limited circumstances. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
