On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 09:19:03AM +0100, Sue Daniels wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote Sunday, September 23, 2012 3:20 AM > > > That's certainly a consistent view to take, but it might be worth > > discussing that further at some point. If there's a separate > > namespace then I can't see any technical problems, and some users > > may appreciate being able to define short strings like $a or $f > > without any conflict with existing commands and keywords. > > Other users may wish to redefine predefs. That ability is more > valuable, I think.
Nothing's stopping us from having the normal \commands (including both predefs and user-created and user-redefined), along with $commands (which is completely empty and available for any user definitions). - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
