David Kastrup writes: > I think it was during the documentation of the footnote stuff that we > came up with several examples (including use of s1*0/<>) that made clear > that we were better off refining the code rather than the documentation. > > And that's fine. Changing code because it would be too embarrassing to > document it is certainly a better option than leaving it undocumented.
New functionality must come with minimal documentation, otherwise it does not exist. We cannot expect from documentation writers to work from reading the code. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
