>   \after { c'1\p } 4 \after \< 1*1/6 \!
> 
> This is now in "time order" but I am not really convinced that it is
> less confusing.

You are right, it's worse.  Your first solution is fine except that it
doesn't follow lilypond's suffix notation.


    Werner

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to