On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:15 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Given existing naming choices, \hide/\unHide is an obvious pairing.
> \omit/unOmit would be logical but awkward, I'd lead towards
> \omit/\remit.

Whoah, i didn't know that "remit" is a proper English word!
Sounds like "Kermit" to me... :P
(frankly, one of the problems i have with "omit" is the fact that it's
not a basic English word - it's better to use simple words for the
sake of non-native English speakers)

> \no has no good reversion, and the pairing \no
> DynamicText / \yes DynamicText is too awful to contemplate.

\yes would be horrible.
But \restore is not that bad...

Janek

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to