> So, your opinion is that lilypond-book SHOULD process the
> \lilypond{...} code inside the \iffalse section and spectacularly
> fail.
It is debatable how much plain TeX code should be used at all in a
LaTeX document. Just think of a latex->html translation.
> With my colleagues, I have never seen \begin{comment} for comments,
> all the researchers I have worked with so far were using \iffalse.
OK.
> So, I will add \begin{comment} to the pattern, too,
Thanks.
> but I still think that lilypond-book SHOULD ignore everything inside
> \iffalse.
OK.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
