>> I like the name \temporary. Is this of practical use outside of
>> music functions also?
>
> The main point is to restore to a previous state after a temporary
> override. This is of course also useful in music assigned to music
> variables. In the context of a larger music piece, you can, of
> course, just repeat any previous overrides that you want to see
> reestablished, but this is not cut&paste friendly.
OK, for music functions and variable assignments. Then, I think,
\temporary is indeed just fine.
> Maybe \push\override ... but this has the disadvantage that you
> never actively see a \pop. Hm. Maybe we should rename \undo to
> \pop then?
I think that we either need a consistent use if \push and \pop, or we
should refrain using it. Given that the Scheme functions handling the
stack are not mapped one-to-one to user commands, as you've shown in a
previous mail, I think we should avoid \push and \pop.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
