On 2012/10/29 08:10:53, J_lowe wrote:
Setting to patch-review as I need some more competent devs to look
over this new
re-arrangement and suggest better/alternative definitions of the
commands (if
needed).

(better) @lilypond examples will come later

This is a work in progress to then help get some consistency and
accuracy for
the newer behaviour in 2.17+ for these \override \single \tweak etc.
commands.

@colin - please don't consider this for countdown, I just don't know
how else to
get devs to look at this ;)

Oh, it is easy to overrule Colin on a countdown.  Just set the status
back to review.  Of course, this works best if you are the owner of a
particular issue.  If you do that too often to _other_ people's issues,
you are not likely to increase your popularity...

http://codereview.appspot.com/6742057/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to