David wrote Tuesday, October 30, 2012 6:05 AM
> Actually, I would be perfectly fine with binning both \violin.1 as well > as \"violin1". I am just afraid it would be a bit like taking candy > from a baby. > > But if people are fine with the prospect of waiting until \violin1, > \violin 1, \violin $(1+1) will all work, then that's likely the cleanest > solution. Definitely the one with the least impact on syntax > highlighting. ... > Rethinking this carefully, a native \violin2 (as an actual > array/vector/alist) should not really be away more than a few months > hopefully. In that case I'd prefer to wait. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
