----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Further problems with makeLSR


"Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> writes:

I've had another go at running makeLSR to update the snippet lists,
and this time it seems to be reverting changes David made.  An
example:

diff --git
a/Documentation/snippets/adding-a-figured-bass-above-or-below-the-not
index cfe71cb..6e15690 100644
---
a/Documentation/snippets/adding-a-figured-bass-above-or-below-the-notes.ly
+++
b/Documentation/snippets/adding-a-figured-bass-above-or-below-the-notes.ly
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
%% and then run scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py
%%
%% This file is in the public domain.
-\version "2.17.6"
+\version "2.16.0"

\header {
  lsrtags = "ancient-notation, chords, contexts-and-engravers"
@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ bass = {
}
continuo = \figuremode {
  <_>4 <6>4 <5/>4
-  \override Staff.BassFigureAlignmentPositioning.direction = #UP
+  \override Staff.BassFigureAlignmentPositioning #'direction = #UP

makeLSR runs convert-ly, and this seems to be replacing the 2.17.6
version number with 2.16.0 and reverting the change to the dot or hash
syntax.  It looks as though convert-ly is not picking up the rule to
update this syntax properly.  Anyone any idea why?

Oh rats.  The problem would be that any changed snippets need to be
copied to snippets/new (after editing their headers appropriately) in
order not to be overwritten by LSR.

And, of course, after the latest change this concerns a sizable number
of snippets.  We need to get this done before the next LSR update.
Anybody up for it?

--
David Kastrup


I think that _might_ not be necessary. If it's possible to update them with a convert-ly rule, they should not need adding to snippets/new. Otherwise, we'll end up with too many snippets in /new to be comfortable with.

Alternatively - does the older syntax still work?

--
Phil Holmes

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to