Am 06.11.2012 22:10, schrieb David Kastrup: > Joram Berger <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> here is another (probably not so well thought) idea: >> >> Issue: \noBeam is a quite long command if used heavily and for the >> opposite feature [ and ] represent much more convenient solutions. >> >> Possible solution: use X or ; (or any other reasonable token as a >> \noBeam equivalent. >> >> Again, this is just an idea, which might be no good one. > > You know \autoBeamOff ? >
I know that. It's no real problem, just wanted to mention it. The idea came up while making a cheat sheet and realizing, that [ and ] have no equally short counterpart. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
