On 2012/11/27 00:10:24, dak wrote:
On 2012/11/26 21:53:09, Trevor Daniels wrote:

> I think you've chosen the best way forward here.

Calling a strategic retreat "the best way forward" might
be putting a bit of a spin on it.

:)

It would have been prohibitively costly for the ground
forces to secure the conquered areas.

Indeed.  Ensuring the flanks are adequately covered
before advancing is often forgotten in the excitement
of battle.

http://codereview.appspot.com/6851102/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to