Thomas Morley <[email protected]> writes: > I noticed an oversight in \rest-by-number > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2966 > resulting in a bad/wrong example in the NR. > > What's the way to fix it: > a) revert the patch > or > b) create a followup > ?
If the oversight only affects uses of \rest-by-number and does not cause compilation of either code or docs to abort, there is nothing gained by reverting the patch. So it would appear a timely course of b) would be appropriate. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
