I'm happy with this with the change below. The formatting of this section (and the CG in general) has never been systematically reviewed, so there's no point in being strict about it here. The text is understandable even though it doesn't fit into the surrounding material in the best possible way.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7013043/diff/3003/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi File Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/7013043/diff/3003/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi#newcode149 Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi:149: @contributions that contain examples using overrides or tweaks Not sure what you intended here. Does the @ mean there is an omitted texinfo command? Maybe this line should just be deleted. https://codereview.appspot.com/7013043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
