"[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes: > On 25 févr. 2013, at 15:10, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > >> James <[email protected]> writes: >> >>>> On 25 February 2013 12:00, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >>>>> I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - >>>>> the output shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe >>>>> contained the wrong version number). Output is at >>>>> >>>>> http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.13/ >>>>> >>>>> As might be supposed, most of the differences are connecting >>>>> bar lines. >>>> >>>> >>>> Good grief. Yes. A real pity that our default regtest comparisons >>>> blanked those out. >>>> >>>> >>>> Well it could always be a case of me missing that assuming I did the >>>> check. >> >> Unlikely. It is pretty likely that I also looked at regtest >> differences, and the differences are far from subtle and rare. So I am >> pretty sure that the tests were not given any visual presentation, >> instead just being filtered prematurely based on the metrics. > > This is the case. Span Bar heights do not come from stencils (I > believe they have an empty height by default), so changes in the > stencils won't appear in the regtests comparisons, which focus > exclusively on changes in height and width.
Maybe we should put span bars and possibly other metrically challenged elements into the ever-changing regtest. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
