Just a thought: LilyPond allows for any number, not just "8," so doesn't ClefTransposition actually make more sense?
-David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Hohl" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2013 6:35:56 AM Subject: Re: suggestion: change OctavateEight name to ClefTransposition - opinions? Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł: > Hi, > > The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that > this grob is related to the clef, and anyway the clef can be > "transposed" by any amount, not just an octave. > I suggest to rename this grob to ClefTransposition or something > similar (since this is not strictly transposition, it may be best to > use a slightly different name... ClefShift? At any rate, > ClefOctavation would make much more sense than OctavateEight). > We can also change names of some related context properties, for > example clefOctavation, clefOctavationStyle etc. My only worry is > that they may become too similar (clefTransposition and > ClefTransposition). > Thoughts? +1 I'd prefer ClefTransposition over ClefShift, since the latter implies some shift relative to the clef's default position. Marc > > I'll propose a patch if there's support for the change. > Janek > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
