----- Original Message -----
From: "David Kastrup" <[email protected]>
To: "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Werner LEMBERG" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2013 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: Stable release state
"Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> writes:
At present, we're actually premature in proposing a freeze to make
ready for a release candidate. We have a number of outstanding
critical bugs and regressions which need fixing before we go anywhere
with a new stable release. So, currently, step one is to reduce them
to zero. Step 2 is to propose and agree a development freeze.
Tackling step 1 and step 2 in this order was seminal for 2.16 taking a
year longer than anticipated.
--
David Kastrup
In that case, we need to be more active in getting rid of criticals and
regressions. Are you proposing we ignore them?
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
