hmm. i don't see any protests so i'll push it. 2013/4/21 Janek Warchoł <[email protected]>: > 2013/4/21 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >> Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3309 >>> https://codereview.appspot.com/8614045 >>> >>> This had passed countdown (with 0 reviews). I'm not sure if it's >>> "stable enough" to be included in 2.18 - should i push it or set it's >>> status to waiting? >> >> I haven't reviewed the patch as such. If it is just a rename, you >> should be able to verify using "git grep" that no occurences of the old >> name remain so I don't see that as a problematic change. > > I did that. What worries me is that i've done this before, and > apparently i missed some occurences then. The rename seems not to be > so trivial, that's why i'm not sure. I'd feel more comfortable > pushing this if there was any review. > > Janek
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
