[moving to -devel] 2013/4/25 David Pirotte <[email protected]>: > >> Doing it in scheme does seem to offer some nice advantages. I looked into >> it and >> found that there's SXML, a scheme version of XML: > > for info [in guile 2]: > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/SXML.html#SXML > > what is the priority of lilypond being built upon guile-2, if there still is, > and > if, how far is lilypond from effectively being built upon guile-2 ?
I think Ian Hulin knows this best. As for myself, since David K recently pointed that supporting Unicode in a fix for issue 2451 should be done using guile-2, i'm a bit interested in getting this done (but it's not a priority for me personally). cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
