Just FYI: this has morphed and is now http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3186 It's almost done, waits only for completing issue 3239.
best, Janek 2012/1/9 Neil Puttock <[email protected]>: > 2012/1/8 Janek Warchoł <[email protected]>: > >> ok, i think i understand what you said (that's a success :) ), but i >> don't know what should i use instead of glyph-name callback - a hint >> please? > > Write an offset callback instead? It should be safe to access > glyph-name at that point. > > Cheers, > Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
