>>> That being said, the bar number engraver uses >>> ly:side_position_interface::move-to-extremal-staff for its >>> vertical positioning. The same would likely be done for marks. >>> The question is what we should be doing here with regard to >>> interrupted staves in general, and/or with regard to ossia staves >>> in particular. >> >> Well, for bar numbers and marks, a temporary disabled or not-yet >> existing staff should be treated as not present. So it seems we >> have a bug in the code. > > +1
I'm no longer sure about this: For example, if you use this reduced
example
<<
\new Staff = "ossia" { \stopStaff s1*6 }
\new Staff \relative c' {
c4 b c2
e4 f e2
g4 a g2 \break
c4 b c2
<<
{ g4 a g2 }
\context Staff = ossia {
\startStaff g4 e8 f g2 \stopStaff
}
>>
e4 d c2
}
>>
it is not easy to decide whether the bar number should be moved to the
non-ossia staff. So maybe a warning in the documentation is more
appropriate which says that \startStaff and \stopStaff might cause
issues, in combination with an improved documentation example.
Werner
<<inline: ossia.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
