https://codereview.appspot.com/10473043/diff/1/Documentation/extending/scheme-tutorial.itely File Documentation/extending/scheme-tutorial.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/10473043/diff/1/Documentation/extending/scheme-tutorial.itely#newcode1320 Documentation/extending/scheme-tutorial.itely:1320: @code{SequentialMusic} with the two @code{NoteEvent}. For adding to a Awkward grammar which is probably the reason that the previous version chose the grammatically nicer (and factually wrong) "@code{EventChords}". The "programmer" fix would be "@code{NoteEvent}s" but I think I prefer "@code{NoteEvent} elements". While it would be feasible to put "@code{...}" around "elements" in this usage as it is properly the name of the @code{SequentialMusic} property, I think that is too clever. So for me, just "@code{NoteEvent} elements" would be best here. At any rate: thanks for catching that oversight. https://codereview.appspot.com/10473043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
