2013/7/13 Phil Holmes <[email protected]>
> We currently refer to Gardner Read and others in the NR under the very
> sparsely populated Contemporary Music section of the NR:
>
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/**v2.17/Documentation/notation/**
> further-reading-and-scores-of-**interest<http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/further-reading-and-scores-of-interest>
>
> It strikes me that this would be better at the end of section 1 of the LM:
>
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/**v2.17/Documentation/learning/**
> overview-of-manuals<http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/learning/overview-of-manuals>
>
> "Further reading", plus adding at the very least Elaine Gould's book.
> Does anyone disagree?
>
BTW, shouldn't the node title be included inside the @ignore?
@node Scores and musical examples
@unnumberedsubsubsec Scores and musical examples
@ignore
Rough list of composers whose work could be included
(in alphabetical order, perhaps with suggested work):
Pierre Boulez (Le Marteau Sans Maître?)
John Cage (Freeman Etudes?)
George Crumb (Black Angels?)
Brian Ferneyhough (Transit? Time & Motion Studies?)
Ben Johnston (extended just intonation example)
György Ligeti (several, including Hamburg Concerto)
Krzysztof Penderecki (Threnody to the Victims of Hiroshima?)
Karlheinz Stockhausen (Gruppen?)
@end ignore
It was ignored from the very beginning (perhaps a kind of todo list):
commit 7df6ed01116dac2a8ea1babfb3f7184859ebf6c7
Author: Joseph Wakeling <[email protected]>
Date: Sat Sep 5 22:30:58 2009 +0200
Doc: Further Reading for contemporary music.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
