Hi all, 2013/7/18 Graham Percival <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:48:52PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: >> Three options I can think of. 1) use something other than Google. > > Github has an API; we could make an actual "lilypond" organization > with them. Granted, that's still putting one's eggs in a > commercial company's basket, but at least github is focused on > development rather than google's rather broad interests.
I think using github is a good idea. As a bonus, github users (and there are many of them) will probably be more likely to contribute to lilypond. Also, github has a quite well thought-out web UI, which allows for example to make a commit using a web interface. This might make things a bit more accessible to newcomers. > I don't think we want to go with self-hosting (too much admin), agreed. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
