On 13-08-11 10:21 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Campbell" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Windows tutorial
Is it the non-optimised builds which fail? For a data point, I
renamed my ~/lilypond-git then used lily-git.tcl to recreate it,
after which I went through the rest of the build as normal. All I saw
were the usual warnings about typing and some circular references,
but both the binary build and make doc completed normally, producing
a binary which reports as version 2.17.24 and corresponding
documentation.
In saying "it would require the ability to make doc" I was referring
to the fact that, for quite a few contributors, it just takes too
long. I can fiddle a make doc by editing orchestra.ly, completing the
make and then undoing the edit.
My system is Ubuntu 10.04 with 64 bit, but I don't know what makes my
build fail and others not.
So, we have two systems performing repeatably: your Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit
and my Linux Mint 15 64-bit Ubuntu derivative. Perhaps there is some way
of narrowing the (probably many) differences between our systems?
Cheers,
Colin
--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-Maya Angelou, poet (1928- )
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
