----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net>
To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond benchmarking
Phil Holmes <email <at> philholmes.net> writes:
Summary: 2.12 was very slow and unreliable on large scores. 2.14, 2.16
and
2.17.26 are similar: it look like current devel is slower where there's a
lot of interleaving of notes and dynamics to be done, which is probably
to
be expected with the more sophisticated skylining code. I'd conclude
there
is no fundamental performance problem with our current build.
I assume your tables show the numbers of minutes required to typeset
the input ?
Seconds, not minutes :-)
FWIW, I find my build machine on Ubuntu is much faster.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
