2013/9/21 Heikki Tauriainen <[email protected]>: > Quoting Janek Warcho? <[email protected]>: > >> As for the patches themselves, are you using Git? It would be >> slightly more convenient for us if you sent us "Git-formatted" patches >> (i.e. patches representing complete git commits), [...] > > Here are the Git-formatted patches.
thanks, this makes things easier for us. 2013/9/21 Keith OHara <[email protected]>: > Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond <at> gmail.com> writes: >> As for the patches themselves, are you using Git? It would be >> slightly more convenient for us if you sent us "Git-formatted" patches >> (i.e. patches representing complete git commits), or uploaded them for >> review as described here >> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/commits-and- > patches#uploading-a-patch-for-review >> > > Janek, this looks like a good opportunity for you to demonstrate > the Lilypond node at github. Thanks for this suggestion, Keith, but considering the ongoing heated discussion i think that it would be a bad idea. And i wouldn't want to use somebody else's patch to prove my points - if i were to upload anything to github, it would be my own patch. > I managed the previous set of patches from Heikki using Reitveld > https://codereview.appspot.com/6428075 > but I will be away next week so if you help thinks will move faster. Here it is: http://codereview.appspot.com/13523049 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3581 I apologize for the delay. Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
