2013/10/16 <[email protected]>: > That's not really the main point. It would have been simple previously > to make \tweak be equivalent to \override rather than \once \override > when used on symbol lists. > > \tweak syntax for overrides is not really pretty, but it makes it easy > to implement mixed tweaks/overrides like \hide or \omit. But there are > some changes which only make sense as a \once\override or a \tweak (like > footnotes), and now one can write \once\tweak without a problem, even > when it turns out \tweak is being indeed used as a \tweak and not as an > \override. > > It's not really an advertisable feature: it's just making several tools > fit the same handle for convenience, but it's not like the resulting > look is particularly elegant.
Indeed, it's not elegant. But i hope that one day there will be an elegant tool that could do everything; this patch is a move in that direction so i support it despite it being not elegant. best, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
