On Nov 1, 2013, at 7:49 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > On 2013/10/30 08:09:53, mike7 wrote: >> On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:32 AM, mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > >> > I do not understand the Todo: comment; nothing should have been > suicided >> > at this stage. > >> The original clef is suicided in the handle_prebroken_dependencies > function, >> which is the same place that the new begin and end of line grobs are > created >> (see break-substitution.cc). > >> Conceptually, I don’t like the idea that a suicided grob contains > useful >> information. > > I see now. > It seems that !is_live() means that we are sure the Grob will never be > printed, yet we need to keep the data structure around for some other > reason. You might put your name on the "Todo" comment so people know > the point of view is from somebody other that the original author of the > handle_prebroken_dependencies() function. >
Ok. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
