Mike Solomon <[email protected]> writes: > On Nov 2, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 02/11/13 15:12, Mike Solomon wrote: >>> Not sure what a git formatted patch is…I can, however, download the >>> Rietveld patch and send it to you if you want. >> >> Git can extract text patch files from your version history, which >> can then be sent by email. It's a simpler way of getting patches >> to/from people than needing to publish branches. >> > > Ah, OK. > > The issue is that I don’t want to send anything from my computer for > pushing, as my libguile is broken and I’m not comfortable sending a > patch for pushing unless I’ve done a clean compile with it once just > in case. The Rietveld version is the last reviewed and OKd one, so > I’d prefer that someone pushes that.
That does not seem like it would magically compile itself any more than when you send a properly formatted patch. Actually, it _will_ magically compile itself (that's what Patchy-staging is for, but whatever. I'll pick up from Rietveld if that's what you prefer, but it _does_ make more trouble for yourself when rebasing and merging if a naked change is getting pushed rather than a properly recognized git patch. With the latter, git associates somewhat more identity. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
